Tech
From Digital Twin to Engineering Tool: Turning Simulation into Structured Decision-Making
A high-fidelity vehicle model is a prerequisite for professional simulation. On its own, however, it is not sufficient.
The real value of simulation emerges not from realism alone, but from how that realism is used.
In a professional motorsport environment, a simulator session is not a demonstration. It is an engineering exercise. Each run has a defined objective, each change has a rationale, and each conclusion must withstand scrutiny.
At Virtex, simulation is treated as a structured decision-making platform built around a validated digital twin.
The digital twin as a working reference
The term “digital twin” is often used loosely. In a professional context, it carries a more specific meaning.
A digital twin is not simply a model that resembles the real car. It is a model whose physical structure, parameterisation and dynamic behaviour are sufficiently representative that it can be used to draw engineering conclusions.
As Barney Hassell explains:
“Once the physical topology is correct and the model is properly parameterised, the simulator becomes an extension of the real car. The objective is not to replicate appearance, but to replicate response.”
That distinction is critical. Engineers do not require a visually convincing environment. They require a platform in which changes to spring rates, damper curves, ride heights or aero balance produce responses that correlate with track behaviour.
Without that correlation, simulation cannot inform decisions with confidence.
The iterative loop: run, analyse, refine

A typical professional simulator session follows a disciplined loop.
A baseline configuration is defined. A test plan is established. The driver completes a run with specific objectives, whether related to setup direction, tyre understanding, aero platform behaviour or preparation for a circuit event.
Data is logged and analysed. Driver feedback is gathered. Parameters are adjusted. The system is evaluated again.
This iterative cycle continues throughout the session.
“Simulator development is inherently iterative,” Barney notes. “We test, analyse, refine. Driver feedback helps identify where the model needs adjustment, and data helps validate those adjustments. Over time, the model converges towards the real car.”
The convergence process is as important as the initial modelling. Even with detailed design data and rig measurements, certain behaviours must be inferred and refined through correlation work. Simulator sessions therefore serve not only to prepare teams, but also to improve the digital twin itself.
In this sense, both the car model and the driver evolve during a session.
Correlation as a continuous process
Correlation is often discussed as a discrete milestone. In practice, it is continuous.
Track data provides reference behaviour under real conditions. The simulator provides a controlled environment in which hypotheses can be tested. Differences between the two are analysed and understood. Parameters are refined accordingly.
The objective is not perfect identity under every possible condition. It is engineering reliability within the operational envelope relevant to the programme.
This reliability allows teams to use simulation for meaningful development direction work. If a change in rear ride height produces a predictable aerodynamic balance shift in simulation, and that relationship has been validated, engineers can use the simulator to explore configuration space efficiently before committing to track time.
Controlling variables that cannot be controlled on track
One of the most powerful aspects of simulation lies in repeatability.
Real-world testing is subject to environmental variability. Track temperature evolves. Wind conditions fluctuate. Tyres degrade. Traffic interferes. These factors introduce noise into data and complicate interpretation.
In a simulator built on physically correct models, those variables can be controlled.
Complexity itself can be adjusted. Certain physical effects can be isolated or simplified to study their individual influence. Sensitivity analyses can be performed under repeatable boundary conditions. Engineers can evaluate cause and effect relationships that would be difficult, expensive or impractical to isolate on track.
As Barney explains:
“By varying the complexity of the physical effects captured in the model, we can control factors in the simulator that we cannot control in the real world. That makes it a powerful tool for structured investigations.”
This capability shifts the simulator from a preparatory device to an experimental platform.

From preparation to decision-making
At the highest level of motorsport, time and budget constraints limit on-track experimentation. Simulation provides an environment in which development pathways can be explored with lower risk.
However, this only holds true if the simulator is embedded within a disciplined engineering workflow.
A simulator day should have defined objectives, structured test matrices and clear evaluation criteria. Driver feedback must be contextualised against data. Model refinements must be documented and validated. Results must feed back into the broader vehicle development process.
When these conditions are met, simulation becomes more than a training aid. It becomes a decision-support system.
Extending the car beyond the circuit
Ultimately, the purpose of professional simulation is not to replace the track. It is to extendd the car's development environment beyond it.
A validated digital twin, coupled with a physically accurate cockpit interface and structured engineering methodology, allows teams to arrive at the circuit with clearer direction. Setup baselines are more informed. Sensitivity ranges are better understood. Driver preparation is more focused.
The car that rolls out of the garage is therefore not starting from zero.
In that context, the simulator is not a parallel world. It is a continuation of the real one.
For teams operating at the highest level, that continuity is where simulation delivers its true value.

Thank you!
Your submission has been received!















